branding-simply-linux-8.2.0-alt1.src	requires-ImageMagick	info	Dependency on ImageMagick (compat package) found. It probably should be replaced with more specific dependency like /usr/bin/convert or ImageMagick-tools, or it can be already autodetected by findreq-shell.; 
branding-simply-linux-alterator-8.2.0-alt1.noarch	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-alterator-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, but the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-alterator-6.0.0-alt3.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; 
branding-simply-linux-indexhtml-8.2.0-alt1.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	There are file conflicts with the package branding-alt-starterkit-indexhtml-p8-alt0.M80P.5.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-indexhtml-7.0.5-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-indexhtml-8.0.0-alt0.6.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (12 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lxdesktop-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt7.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-office-server-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-indexhtml-7.0.0-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-tablet-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-informika-schoolmaster-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt46.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-ivk-chainmail-indexhtml-3.0-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-sisyphus-server-light-indexhtml-1.9.3-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-xalt-kworkstation-indexhtml-8.3.0-alt4.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (12 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
branding-simply-linux-menu-8.2.0-alt1.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	There are file conflicts with the package branding-alt-spserver-menu-8.0-alt0.M80P.2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-alt-spworkstation-menu-8.0-alt0.M80P.2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-junior-menu-7.0.5-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-master-menu-7.0.5-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-server-menu-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-teacher-menu-7.0.5-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
branding-simply-linux-notes-8.2.0-alt1.noarch	file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile	warn	Files below <tt>/usr</tt> may not be marked as conffiles, since;  <tt>/usr</tt> might be mounted read-only and thus, the local system;  administrator would not have a chance to modify this configuration;  file.; ; 
branding-simply-linux-xfce-settings-8.2.0-alt1.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	File /etc/skel/.gtkrc-2.0 conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-graphics-8.0.0-alt0.6.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; File /etc/skel/.gtkrc-2.0 conflicts with the package branding-xalt-kworkstation-graphics-8.3.0-alt4.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/helpers.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-simple-1.0-alt6.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/Xcursor.xrdb (9 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
branding-simply-linux-xfce-settings-8.2.0-alt1.noarch	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch, but the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.;