| |
rpm id |
test |
Status |
message |
 |
svox-pico-20120212-alt2.x86_64 |
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so |
info |
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libttspico.so but just /usr/lib64/libttspico.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libttspico.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libttspico.so to \%files of svox-pico-20120212-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test. |
|
svox-pico-20120212-alt2.x86_64 |
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share |
info |
The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere. |
|
svox-pico-20120212-alt2.x86_64 |
library-pkgnames |
info |
package contains public library which is used in external packages: name should be lib* according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs |
 |
svox-pico-20120212-alt2.x86_64 |
library-pkgnames-static |
warn |
package contains static library which has the same name as a shared library in the repository, but neither package name ends with -devel-static according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs nor the package explicitly conflicts with the package with .so library |