Repocop reports by srpm

	rpm id	test	Status	message
	branding-simply-linux-8.2.0-alt1.src	requires-ImageMagick	info	Dependency on ImageMagick (compat package) found. It probably should be replaced with more specific dependency like /usr/bin/convert or ImageMagick-tools, or it can be already autodetected by findreq-shell.
	branding-simply-linux-alterator-8.2.0-alt1.noarch	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-alterator-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, but the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-alterator-6.0.0-alt3.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
	branding-simply-linux-indexhtml-8.2.0-alt1.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	There are file conflicts with the package branding-alt-starterkit-indexhtml-p8-alt0.M80P.4.1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-indexhtml-7.0.5-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-indexhtml-8.0.0-alt0.6.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (12 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lxdesktop-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt7.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-office-server-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-indexhtml-7.0.0-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-tablet-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-informika-schoolmaster-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt46.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-ivk-chainmail-indexhtml-3.0-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-sisyphus-server-light-indexhtml-1.9.3-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-xalt-kworkstation-indexhtml-8.3.0-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (12 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
	branding-simply-linux-menu-8.2.0-alt1.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	There are file conflicts with the package branding-alt-spserver-menu-8.0-alt0.M80P.2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-alt-spworkstation-menu-8.0-alt0.M80P.2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-junior-menu-7.0.5-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-master-menu-7.0.5-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-server-menu-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-teacher-menu-7.0.5-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
	branding-simply-linux-notes-8.2.0-alt1.noarch	file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile	warn	Files below /usr may not be marked as conffiles, since /usr might be mounted read-only and thus, the local system administrator would not have a chance to modify this configuration file.
	branding-simply-linux-xfce-settings-8.2.0-alt1.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	File /etc/skel/.gtkrc-2.0 conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-graphics-8.0.0-alt0.6.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. File /etc/skel/.gtkrc-2.0 conflicts with the package branding-xalt-kworkstation-graphics-8.3.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/helpers.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-simple-1.0-alt6.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/Xcursor.xrdb (9 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
	branding-simply-linux-xfce-settings-8.2.0-alt1.noarch	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch, but the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.