gnome-commander-1.2.8.10-alt1.x86_64 altlinux-find-lang-gnome warn Language specific gnome files in /usr/share/omf should be marked, for example, using %find_lang --with-gnome. See http://www.altlinux.org/FindLangPolicy for details.; gnome-commander-1.2.8.10-alt1.x86_64 arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share info The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; gnome-commander-1.2.8.10-alt1.x86_64 freedesktop-desktop warn desktop-file-validate utility exited abnormally with the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/gnome-commander.desktop: error: (will be fatal in the future): value "FileManager" in key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" requires another category to be present among the following categories: System;FileTools; gnome-paint-0.4.0-alt1.x86_64 freedesktop-desktop warn desktop-file-validate utility exited abnormally with the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/gnome-paint.desktop: error: (will be fatal in the future): value "RasterGraphics" in key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" requires another category to be present among the following categories: Graphics;2DGraphics; installer-distro-backup-server-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-centaurus-stage2-6.0-alt13.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-chainmail-stage2-2.1-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt22.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-junior-stage2-5.0-alt21.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-lxdesktop-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-office-server-stage2-5.0-alt28.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-server-light-stage2-6.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-simply-linux-stage2-6.0-alt6.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-workbench-stage2-5.0-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-office-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-lite-stage2-0.2-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-stage2-0.2-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; installer-distro-lxdesktop-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-backup-server-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-centaurus-stage2-6.0-alt13.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-chainmail-stage2-2.1-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt22.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-junior-stage2-5.0-alt21.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-office-server-stage2-5.0-alt28.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-server-light-stage2-6.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-simply-linux-stage2-6.0-alt6.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-workbench-stage2-5.0-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-office-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-lite-stage2-0.2-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-stage2-0.2-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; libvmime-static-0.9.2-alt1.M60P.2.svn581.x86_64 library-pkgnames-static warn package contains static library which has the same name as a shared library in the repository, but neither package name ends with -devel-static according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs nor the package explicitly conflicts with the package with .so library; lxdm-theme-abstraction-0.1-alt6.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; pcmanfm2-0.9.9-alt10.x86_64 freedesktop-desktop warn desktop-file-validate utility exited abnormally with the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/pcmanfm.desktop: error: (will be fatal in the future): value "FileManager" in key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" requires another category to be present among the following categories: System;FileTools; /usr/share/applications/pcmanfm.desktop: warning: value "x-directory/normal;inode/directory;" for key "MimeType" in group "Desktop Entry" contains value "x-directory/normal" which is a MIME type that should probably not be used: "x-directory" is an old media type that should be replaced with a modern equivalent; shutter-0.87.3-alt1.noarch freedesktop-desktop warn desktop-file-validate utility exited abnormally with the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/shutter.desktop: error: file contains group "Select Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format should start with "X-"; /usr/share/applications/shutter.desktop: error: file contains group "Screen Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format should start with "X-"; /usr/share/applications/shutter.desktop: error: file contains group "Window Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format should start with "X-"; /usr/share/applications/shutter.desktop: error: file contains group "Active Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format should start with "X-"; zarafa-client-7.0.2-alt0.M60P.3.x86_64 altlinux-find-lang-mo warn Language specific files in /usr/share/locale should be marked, for example, using %find_lang. See http://www.altlinux.org/FindLangPolicy for details.; zarafa-client-7.0.2-alt0.M60P.3.x86_64 rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-symlink warn value of symlink /usr/lib64/libmapi.so.0 is different from the same symlink in the package libmapi-0.11-alt0.1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; zarafa-client-debuginfo-7.0.2-alt0.M60P.3.x86_64 rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-symlink warn value of symlink /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libmapi.so.0.debug is different from the same symlink in the package libmapi-debuginfo-0.11-alt0.1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; value of symlink /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libmapi.so.debug is different from the same symlink in the package libmapi-debuginfo-0.11-alt0.1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; value of symlink /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libmapi.so.debug is different from the same symlink in the package monetdb-common-debuginfo-11.5.3-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; zarafa-devel-7.0.2-alt0.M60P.3.x86_64 rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-symlink warn value of symlink /usr/lib64/libmapi.so is different from the same symlink in the package openchange-devel-0.11-alt0.1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; value of symlink /usr/lib64/libmapi.so is different from the same symlink in the package monetdb-common-11.5.3-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.;