alt-notes-children-0.1-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package alt-notes-junior-0.2-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package alt-notes-junior-sj-0.2-alt4.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package alt-notes-junior-sm-0.2-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package alt-notes-server-lite-0.1-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-school-lite-alterator-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-alterator-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-school-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-gnome-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-office-server-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-school-lite-notes-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-notes-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-notes-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-notes-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-notes-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-notes-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-school-lite-release-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-office-server-20080516-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-p5-20091027-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-t6-20110505-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-release-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-release-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-release-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-release-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-school-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-xfce-settings-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-office-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-network-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-office-lite-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-simple-1.0-alt4.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-school-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch, but the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; drupal-module-addresses-1.09-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; drupal-module-cck-2.8-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; drupal-module-devel-1.18-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; drupal-module-graphviz-filter-1.5-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; drupal-module-icon-1.0a4-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; drupal-module-jquerymenu-3.3-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; drupal-module-link-2.9-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; drupal-module-pearwiki-filter-1.0.beta1-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; drupal-module-tablefield-1.2-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; drupal-module-tagging-1.1-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; drupal-module-workflow-1.3-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; gpointing-device-settings-1.5.1-alt2.M60P.1.x86_64 freedesktop-categories warn Menu-related Additional Categories (http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html) not found in /usr/share/applications/gpointing-device-settings.desktop. Please add it or report a bug against this test if you already have registered one (not including menu unrelated ones as Core or Qt).; gpointing-device-settings-1.5.1-alt2.M60P.1.x86_64 freedesktop-desktop warn desktop-file-validate utility exited abnormally with the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/gpointing-device-settings.desktop: error: (will be fatal in the future): value "GNOME" in key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" requires another category to be present among the following categories: GTK; gpointing-device-settings-1.5.1-alt2.M60P.1.x86_64 iconsdir experimental Please, move pixmaps from /usr/share/pixmaps to %_liconsdir, %_niconsdir, %_miconsdir according to their size. See http://www.altlinux.org/IconPathsPolicy.; gpointing-device-settings-1.5.1-alt2.M60P.1.x86_64 rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package gsynaptics-0.9.16-alt3.x86_64, but the package gsynaptics-0.9.16-alt3.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; lprof-1.11.4.1-alt6.20100921.x86_64 arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share info The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; lprof-1.11.4.1-alt6.20100921.x86_64 freedesktop-desktop warn desktop-file-validate utility exited abnormally with the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/lprof.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated; /usr/share/applications/lprof.desktop: error: (will be fatal in the future): value "RasterGraphics" in key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" requires another category to be present among the following categories: Graphics;2DGraphics; /usr/share/applications/lprof.desktop: error: (will be fatal in the future): value "lprof.png" for key "Icon" in group "Desktop Entry" is an icon name with an extension, but there should be no extension as described in the Icon Theme Specification if the value is not an absolute path; /usr/share/applications/lprof.desktop: warning: value "" for key "Path" in group "Desktop Entry" does not look like an absolute path; /usr/share/applications/lprof.desktop: warning: key "TerminalOptions" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated; lprof-1.11.4.1-alt6.20100921.x86_64 iconsdir experimental Please, move pixmaps from /usr/share/pixmaps to %_liconsdir, %_niconsdir, %_miconsdir according to their size. See http://www.altlinux.org/IconPathsPolicy.; stardict-ru-tt-1.0-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; stardict-tt-ru-1.0-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; tuxpaint-config-0.0.10-alt1.2.qa1.x86_64 iconsdir experimental Please, move pixmaps from /usr/share/pixmaps to %_liconsdir, %_niconsdir, %_miconsdir according to their size. See http://www.altlinux.org/IconPathsPolicy.;