bootloader-utils-0.4.13-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; bootloader-utils-0.4.13-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package ltsp-client-5.1.21-alt0.11.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-backup-server-alterator-6.0.0-alt3.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-alterator-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-alterator-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-alterator-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-alterator-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-backup-server-alterator-6.0.0-alt3.noarch rpm-package-is-obsoleted warn The package is obsoleted by the package branding-simply-linux-alterator-6.0.0-alt29.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of branding-simply-linux-alterator-6.0.0-alt29.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.; branding-altlinux-backup-server-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-gnome-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-office-server-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-backup-server-notes-6.0.0-alt3.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-notes-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-notes-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-notes-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-notes-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-notes-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-notes-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-backup-server-release-6.0.0-alt3.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-5.0-20081222-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-5.1-20091027-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-office-server-20080516-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-p5-20091027-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-t6-20110505-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-release-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-release-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-release-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-release-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-release-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-centaurus-alterator-6.0.0-alt18.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-alterator-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-alterator-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-alterator-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-alterator-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-alterator-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-centaurus-gnome-settings-6.0.0-alt18.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-freedesktop-menu-gnome-0.44-alt0.M60P.1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package gnome-menus-default-2.30.5-alt4.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-centaurus-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt18.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-gnome-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-office-server-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-centaurus-kde3-settings-6.0.0-alt18.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-kde3-settings-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-kde3-settings-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-centaurus-kde4-settings-6.0.0-alt18.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-kde4-settings-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-kde4-settings-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-centaurus-notes-6.0.0-alt18.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-notes-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-notes-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-notes-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-notes-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-notes-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-notes-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-centaurus-release-6.0.0-alt18.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-5.0-20081222-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-5.1-20091027-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-office-server-20080516-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-p5-20091027-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-t6-20110505-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-release-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-release-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-release-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-release-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-release-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-desktop-alterator-5.9.9-alt2.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-alterator-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt2.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-gnome-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-office-server-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-desktop-kde3-settings-5.9.9-alt2.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-kde3-settings-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package kde-styles-splash-desktop-4.1-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-desktop-kde4-settings-5.9.9-alt2.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-kde4-settings-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-desktop-notes-5.9.9-alt2.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-notes-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-desktop-release-5.9.9-alt2.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-5.0-20081222-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-5.1-20091027-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-office-server-20080516-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-p5-20091027-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-t6-20110505-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-desktop-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt2.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-xfce-settings-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-office-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-network-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-office-lite-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-simple-1.0-alt4.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-desktop-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt2.noarch rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch, but the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; branding-altlinux-gnome-desktop-alterator-5.9.9-alt2.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-alterator-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-gnome-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt2.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-office-server-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-gnome-desktop-notes-5.9.9-alt2.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-notes-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-gnome-desktop-release-5.9.9-alt2.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-5.0-20081222-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-5.1-20091027-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-office-server-20080516-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-p5-20091027-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-t6-20110505-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-release-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-lite-alterator-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-alterator-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-gnome-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-office-server-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-lite-notes-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-notes-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-lite-release-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-5.0-20081222-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-5.1-20091027-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-office-server-20080516-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-p5-20091027-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-t6-20110505-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-release-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-xfce-settings-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-office-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-network-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-office-lite-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-simple-1.0-alt4.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch, but the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; branding-altlinux-office-server-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-gnome-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-office-server-notes-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package alt-license-office-server-0.1-alt1.noarch, but the package alt-license-office-server-0.1-alt1.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; branding-altlinux-office-server-release-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-5.0-20081222-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-5.1-20091027-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-p5-20091027-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-t6-20110505-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-sisyphus-alterator-20101228-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-alterator-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-alterator-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-alterator-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-alterator-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-sisyphus-kde3-settings-20101228-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-kde3-settings-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-kde3-settings-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-kde3-settings-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-sisyphus-kde4-settings-20101228-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-kde4-settings-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-kde4-settings-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-kde4-settings-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-sisyphus-notes-20101228-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-notes-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-notes-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-notes-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-notes-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-sisyphus-release-20101228-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-office-server-20080516-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-sisyphus-xfce-settings-20101228-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-office-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-network-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-office-lite-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-simple-1.0-alt4.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-sisyphus-xfce-settings-20101228-alt1.noarch rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch, but the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; branding-altlinux-spt-alterator-6.0.0-alt7.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-alterator-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-alterator-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-alterator-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-alterator-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-alterator-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-spt-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt7.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-gnome-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-office-server-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-spt-kde3-settings-6.0.0-alt7.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-kde3-settings-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-kde3-settings-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-spt-kde4-settings-6.0.0-alt7.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-kde4-settings-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-kde4-settings-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-spt-notes-6.0.0-alt7.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-notes-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-notes-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-notes-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-notes-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-notes-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-notes-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; branding-altlinux-spt-release-6.0.0-alt7.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-office-server-20080516-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-p5-20091027-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-t6-20110505-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-release-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-release-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-release-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-release-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; celestia-common-1.6.0-alt6.1.x86_64 altlinux-find-lang-mo warn Language specific files in /usr/share/locale should be marked, for example, using %find_lang. See http://www.altlinux.org/FindLangPolicy for details.; celestia-common-1.6.0-alt6.1.x86_64 arch-dep-package-consists-of-usr-share info The package consists of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; celestia-common-1.6.0-alt6.1.x86_64 freedesktop-desktop info desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/celestia.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated; firefox-settings-desktop-5.0-alt3.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; firefox-settings-desktop-5.0-alt3.noarch rpm-package-is-obsoleted warn The package is obsoleted by the package firefox-6.0.2-alt0.M60P.2.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of firefox-6.0.2-alt0.M60P.2.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.; firmware-linux-20110819-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package firmware-i2400m-1.5.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package firmware-rt2870-8-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; firmware-linux-20110819-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-file warn symlink /lib/firmware/rt3090.bin is a file in the package firmware-rt3090-2.2.1.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; firmware-linux-20110819-alt1.noarch rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package firmware-iwl1000-128.50.3.1-alt1.noarch, but the package firmware-iwl1000-128.50.3.1-alt1.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; The package obsoletes the package firmware-iwl3945-15.32-alt1.2.9.noarch, but the package firmware-iwl3945-15.32-alt1.2.9.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; The package obsoletes the package firmware-iwl4965-228.61.2.24-alt2.noarch, but the package firmware-iwl4965-228.61.2.24-alt2.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; The package obsoletes the package firmware-iwl5000-8.24.2.12-alt1.noarch, but the package firmware-iwl5000-8.24.2.12-alt1.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; The package obsoletes the package firmware-iwl5150-8.24.2.2-alt1.noarch, but the package firmware-iwl5150-8.24.2.2-alt1.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; The package obsoletes the package firmware-iwl6000-9.221.4.1-alt1.noarch, but the package firmware-iwl6000-9.221.4.1-alt1.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; The package obsoletes the package firmware-iwl6050-41.28.5.1-alt1.noarch, but the package firmware-iwl6050-41.28.5.1-alt1.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; hugin-2010.4.0-alt2.M60P.1.x86_64 altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so info SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libhuginlevmar.so but just /usr/lib64/libhuginlevmar.so.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libhuginlevmar.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libhuginlevmar.so to \%files of hugin-2010.4.0-alt2.M60P.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; hugin-2010.4.0-alt2.M60P.1.x86_64 arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share info The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; hugin-2010.4.0-alt2.M60P.1.x86_64 buildroot fail found paths to buildroot: /usr/bin/cpfind: Binary file /usr/bin/cpfind matches; hugin-2010.4.0-alt2.M60P.1.x86_64 freedesktop-categories warn Menu-related Additional Categories (http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html) not found in /usr/share/applications/hugin.desktop. Please add it or report a bug against this test if you already have registered one (not including menu unrelated ones as Core or Qt).; Menu-related Additional Categories (http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html) not found in /usr/share/applications/PTBatcherGUI.desktop. Please add it or report a bug against this test if you already have registered one (not including menu unrelated ones as Core or Qt).; hugin-2010.4.0-alt2.M60P.1.x86_64 freedesktop-desktop warn desktop-file-validate utility exited abnormally with the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/hugin.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated; /usr/share/applications/hugin.desktop: error: value "application/x-hugin" for string list key "MimeType" in group "Desktop Entry" does not have a semicolon (';') as trailing character; hugin-2010.4.0-alt2.M60P.1.x86_64 freedesktop-desktop-file-proposed-patch warn Please, apply the repocop patch for /usr/share/applications/hugin.desktop.; Please, apply the repocop patch for /usr/share/applications/PTBatcherGUI.desktop.; hugin-2010.4.0-alt2.M60P.1.x86_64 iconsdir experimental Please, move pixmaps from /usr/share/pixmaps to %_liconsdir, %_niconsdir, %_miconsdir according to their size. See http://www.altlinux.org/IconPathsPolicy.; installer-common-stage2-1.4.14-alt2.x86_64 unsafe-tmp-usage-in-scripts fail The test discovered scripts with errors which may be used by a user for damaging important system files. For example if a script uses in its work a temp file which is created in /tmp directory, then every user can create symlinks with the same name (pattern) in this directory in order to destroy or rewrite some system or another user's files. Scripts _must_ _use_ mktemp/tempfile or must use $TMPDIR. mktemp/tempfile is safest. $TMPDIR is safer than /tmp/ because libpam-tmpdir creates a subdirectory of /tmp that is only accessible by that user, and then sets TMPDIR and other variables to that. Hence, it doesn't matter nearly as much if you create a non-random filename, because nobody but you can access it. Found error in /usr/sbin/install2: $ grep -A5 -B5 /tmp/ /usr/sbin/install2 { AUTOINSTALL= export AUTOINSTALL if cmdline_has_arg ai ; then AUTOINSTALL='/tmp/metadata/autoinstall.scm' fi } set_cdromdev() { -- else echo 'Starting Xorg server...' auto_drivers="$(video_scan -s drivers)" xinit_args='vt7 -dpms -ac -dpi 80 -nolisten tcp -logfile /tmp/x11.log' eval $(grep -s ^xinit_args= /etc/xserver-args) ||: cmd="xinit /usr/sbin/alterator-install2 -- $xinit_args" stop_splash if ! $cmd >>/tmp/install2.log 2>&1; then for drv in $auto_drivers; do echo "Error running Xorg server, trying with driver $drv..." video_setup "$drv" "$XORG_CONF" rc=0 $cmd >>/tmp/install2.log 2>&1 && break || rc=$? done fi fi fi; installer-distro-centaurus-stage2-6.0-alt13.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-backup-server-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-chainmail-stage2-2.1-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt22.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-junior-stage2-5.0-alt21.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-lxdesktop-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-office-server-stage2-5.0-alt28.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-server-light-stage2-6.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-simply-linux-stage2-6.0-alt6.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-workbench-stage2-5.0-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-office-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-lite-stage2-0.2-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-stage2-0.2-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; installer-distro-desktop-5.0-alt22.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-0.2-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-lite-0.2-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; installer-distro-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt22.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-backup-server-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-centaurus-stage2-6.0-alt13.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-chainmail-stage2-2.1-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-junior-stage2-5.0-alt21.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-lxdesktop-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-office-server-stage2-5.0-alt28.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-server-light-stage2-6.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-simply-linux-stage2-6.0-alt6.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-workbench-stage2-5.0-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-office-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-lite-stage2-0.2-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-stage2-0.2-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; installer-distro-junior-5.0-alt21.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-0.2-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-lite-0.2-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; installer-distro-junior-stage2-5.0-alt21.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-backup-server-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-centaurus-stage2-6.0-alt13.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-chainmail-stage2-2.1-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt22.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-lxdesktop-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-office-server-stage2-5.0-alt28.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-server-light-stage2-6.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-simply-linux-stage2-6.0-alt6.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-workbench-stage2-5.0-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-office-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-lite-stage2-0.2-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-stage2-0.2-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; installer-distro-workbench-5.0-alt2.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-0.2-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-lite-0.2-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; installer-distro-workbench-stage2-5.0-alt2.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-backup-server-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-centaurus-stage2-6.0-alt13.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-chainmail-stage2-2.1-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt22.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-junior-stage2-5.0-alt21.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-lxdesktop-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-office-server-stage2-5.0-alt28.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-server-light-stage2-6.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-simply-linux-stage2-6.0-alt6.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-office-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-lite-stage2-0.2-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-stage2-0.2-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; installer-feature-services-0.2-alt1.noarch unsafe-tmp-usage-in-scripts fail The test discovered scripts with errors which may be used by a user for damaging important system files. For example if a script uses in its work a temp file which is created in /tmp directory, then every user can create symlinks with the same name (pattern) in this directory in order to destroy or rewrite some system or another user's files. Scripts _must_ _use_ mktemp/tempfile or must use $TMPDIR. mktemp/tempfile is safest. $TMPDIR is safer than /tmp/ because libpam-tmpdir creates a subdirectory of /tmp that is only accessible by that user, and then sets TMPDIR and other variables to that. Hence, it doesn't matter nearly as much if you create a non-random filename, because nobody but you can access it. Found error in /usr/share/install2/postinstall.d/65-setup-services.sh: $ grep -A5 -B5 /tmp/ /usr/share/install2/postinstall.d/65-setup-services.sh #!/bin/sh . install2-init-functions . shell-config cat /usr/share/install2/services-on | xargs -i chroot $destdir chkconfig {} on >> /tmp/install2.log 2>&1 cat /usr/share/install2/services-off | xargs -i chroot $destdir chkconfig {} off >> /tmp/install2.log 2>&1 :; installer-office-desktop-5.0-alt7.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-0.2-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-lite-0.2-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; installer-office-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt7.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-backup-server-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-centaurus-stage2-6.0-alt13.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-chainmail-stage2-2.1-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt22.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-junior-stage2-5.0-alt21.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-lxdesktop-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-office-server-stage2-5.0-alt28.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-server-light-stage2-6.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-simply-linux-stage2-6.0-alt6.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-workbench-stage2-5.0-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-lite-stage2-0.2-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-stage2-0.2-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; installer-server-0.2-alt2.x86_64 rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-desktop-5.0-alt22.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-junior-5.0-alt21.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-simply-linux-6.0-alt6.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-workbench-5.0-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-office-desktop-5.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-lite-0.2-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; installer-server-stage2-0.2-alt2.x86_64 rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-backup-server-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-centaurus-stage2-6.0-alt13.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-chainmail-stage2-2.1-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt22.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-junior-stage2-5.0-alt21.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-lxdesktop-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-office-server-stage2-5.0-alt28.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-server-light-stage2-6.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-simply-linux-stage2-6.0-alt6.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-distro-workbench-stage2-5.0-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-office-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-lite-stage2-0.2-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; installer-server-stage3-0.2-alt2.x86_64 rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package installer-server-lite-stage3-0.2-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; kde-styles-splash-desktop-4.1-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-kde3-settings-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; livecd-evms-0.2-alt1.noarch init-lsb warn /etc/rc.d/init.d//livecd-evms: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.; livecd-evms-0.2-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; livecd-gnome-nowarn-space-0.3-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; livecd-save-nfs-0.3-alt4.noarch init-condrestart warn /etc/rc.d/init.d/livecd-save-nfs: missing condrestart target. Note: alt-specific script %_sbindir/post_service (used in %post_service macro) depends on condrestart. It is wise to add condrestart anyway./etc/rc.d/init.d/livecd-save-nfs: missing condstop target. Note: alt-specific script %_sbindir/preun_service (used in %preun_service macro) depends on condstop. It is wise to add condstop anyway.; livecd-save-nfs-0.3-alt4.noarch init-lsb warn /etc/rc.d/init.d//livecd-save-nfs: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.; livecd-save-nfs-0.3-alt4.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; livecd-setauth-0.3-alt1.noarch init-condrestart warn /etc/rc.d/init.d/livecd-setauth: missing condrestart target. Note: alt-specific script %_sbindir/post_service (used in %post_service macro) depends on condrestart. It is wise to add condrestart anyway./etc/rc.d/init.d/livecd-setauth: missing condstop target. Note: alt-specific script %_sbindir/preun_service (used in %preun_service macro) depends on condstop. It is wise to add condstop anyway.; livecd-setauth-0.3-alt1.noarch init-lsb warn /etc/rc.d/init.d//livecd-setauth: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.; livecd-setauth-0.3-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; make-initrd-propagator-0.8-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; midori-settings-desktop-5.0.2-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; mkimage-profiles-office-server-5.0.0-alt2.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; opendbx-1.4.3-alt1.1.x86_64 library-pkgnames info package contains public library which is used in external packages: name should be lib* according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs; pam_mount-1.22-alt3.1.x86_64 missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; passivetex-20030310-alt3.qa1.noarch altlinux-policy-tex-obsolete-tetex warn TeX policy forbids explicit dependencies on obsolete TeTeX. But dependency on tetex-latex is found. Please, replace with TeX-neutral dependency.; passivetex-20030310-alt3.qa1.noarch rpm-package-is-obsoleted warn The package is obsoleted by the package texmf-latex-passivetex-20040310-alt1.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of texmf-latex-passivetex-20040310-alt1.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.; passivetex-20030310-alt3.qa1.src altlinux-policy-tex-rpm-build-texmf warn According to TeX policy (http://www.altlinux.org/TeXPolicy) packages that install files to /usr/share/texmf should BuildRequires(pre): rpm-build-texmf for the dependency magic to work.; plymouth-0.8.3-alt19.git20110406.x86_64 init-lsb warn /etc/rc.d/init.d//plymouth: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.; plymouth-0.8.3-alt19.git20110406.x86_64 subdir-in-var-run info Found a subdir in /var/run or /var/lock. /var/run and /var/lock may be mounted as temporary filesystems, so the init.d scripts must handle this correctly. This will typically amount to creating any required subdirectories dynamically when the init.d script is run, rather than including them in the package and relying on rpm to create them.; propagator-20101130-alt9.x86_64 missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; propagator-debuginfo-20101130-alt9.x86_64 missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; pyneighborhood-settings-desktop-0.1-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; shotwell-0.11.0-alt2.x86_64 freedesktop-desktop info desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/shotwell-viewer.desktop: warning: value "image/jpeg;image/png;image/x-canon-cr2;image/x-canon-crw;image/x-fuji-raf;image/x-adobe-dng;image/x-panasonic-raw;image/x-minolta-mrw;image/x-nikon-nef;image/x-olympus-orf;image/x-pentax-pef;image/x-sony-arw;image/x-sony-srf;image/x-sony-sr2;image/x-sigma-x3f;image/x-dcraw;image/x-3fr;image/x-arw;image/x-srf;image/x-sr2;image/x-bay;image/x-crw;image/x-cr2;image/x-cap;image/x-iiq;image/x-eip;image/x-dcs;image/x-dcr;image/x-drf;image/x-k25;image/x-kdc;image/x-dng;image/x-erf;image/x-fff;image/x-mef;image/x-mos;image/x-mrw;image/x-nef;image/x-nrw;image/x-orf;image/x-ptx;image/x-pef;image/x-pxn;image/x-r3d;image/x-raf;image/x-raw;image/x-rw2;image/x-raw;image/x-rwl;image/x-rwz;image/x-x3f;image/tiff;" for key "MimeType" in group "Desktop Entry" contains "image/x-raw" more than once; startup-rescue-0.13-alt1.noarch init-condrestart warn /etc/rc.d/init.d/sysreport: missing condrestart target. Note: alt-specific script %_sbindir/post_service (used in %post_service macro) depends on condrestart. It is wise to add condrestart anyway.; startup-rescue-0.13-alt1.noarch init-lsb warn /etc/rc.d/init.d//sysreport: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.; startup-rescue-0.13-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.; startup-rescue-0.13-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package startup-nanolive-0.1.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package startup-school-rescue-0.4.2-alt2.6.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; volumes-profile-centaurus-0.8-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package volumes-profile-kdesktop-0.6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package volumes-profile-lite-0.2-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package volumes-profile-master-0.1-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; volumes-profile-master-0.1-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package volumes-profile-centaurus-0.8-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package volumes-profile-kdesktop-0.6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package volumes-profile-lite-0.2-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch rpm-package-is-obsoleted warn The package is obsoleted by the package branding-altlinux-desktop-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt2.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of branding-altlinux-desktop-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt2.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.; The package is obsoleted by the package branding-altlinux-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of branding-altlinux-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.; The package is obsoleted by the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-xfce-settings-20101228-alt1.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of branding-altlinux-sisyphus-xfce-settings-20101228-alt1.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.; The package is obsoleted by the package branding-school-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of branding-school-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.; The package is obsoleted by the package branding-simply-linux-xfce-settings-6.0.0-alt29.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of branding-simply-linux-xfce-settings-6.0.0-alt29.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.; xfce-settings-lite-network-1.0-alt7.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-xfce-settings-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-network-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; xfce-settings-lite-office-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-xfce-settings-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-office-lite-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; xfce-settings-lite-office-superlite-1.0-alt7.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-office-superlite-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; xfce-settings-lite-school-0.6-alt2.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-xfce-settings-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-xfce-settings-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; xfce-settings-lite-school-network-0.6-alt2.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-xfce-settings-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-xfce-settings-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-network-1.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; xfce-settings-lite-school-office-lite-0.6-alt2.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-xfce-settings-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-office-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; xfce-settings-lite-school-office-superlite-0.6-alt2.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-office-superlite-1.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; yelp-2.30.2-alt4.M60P.1.x86_64 big-changelog info Package contains big ChangeLog. Gzip it.; yelp-2.30.2-alt4.M60P.1.x86_64 freedesktop-desktop warn desktop-file-validate utility exited abnormally with the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/yelp.desktop: error: (will be fatal in the future): value "GNOME;GTK;Core;Documentation;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" does not contain a registered main category; zram-swap-0.2-alt2.noarch init-lsb warn /etc/rc.d/init.d//zram-swap: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.; zram-swap-0.2-alt2.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.;