alt-license-office-server-0.1-alt1.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	There are file conflicts with the package alt-license-junior-0.1-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package alt-license-junior-sj-0.1-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package alt-license-junior-sl-0.1-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package alt-license-junior-sm-0.1-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package alt-license-junior-st-0.1-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package alt-license-server-0.1-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
alt-license-office-server-0.1-alt1.noarch	rpm-package-is-obsoleted	warn	The package is  obsoleted by the package branding-altlinux-office-server-notes-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of branding-altlinux-office-server-notes-5.9.9-alt1.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.; 
altlinux-release-office-server-20080516-alt1.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	There are file conflicts with the package altlinux-release-4.0-20071206-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-release-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-release-6.0.0-alt18.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-release-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-gnome-desktop-release-5.9.9-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-release-6.0.0-alt35.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-release-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-sisyphus-release-20101228-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-release-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-release-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-release-6.0.0-alt29.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
altlinux-release-office-server-20080516-alt1.noarch	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package altlinux-release-junior-20071215-alt1.noarch, but the package altlinux-release-junior-20071215-alt1.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; The package obsoletes the package altlinux-release-server-20071206-alt1.noarch, but the package altlinux-release-server-20071206-alt1.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; 
altlinux-release-office-server-20080516-alt1.noarch	rpm-package-is-obsoleted	warn	The package is  obsoleted by the package altlinux-release-5.0-20081222-alt1.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of altlinux-release-5.0-20081222-alt1.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.; The package is  obsoleted by the package altlinux-release-5.1-20091027-alt1.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of altlinux-release-5.1-20091027-alt1.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.; The package is  obsoleted by the package altlinux-release-p5-20091027-alt1.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of altlinux-release-p5-20091027-alt1.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.; The package is  obsoleted by the package altlinux-release-sisyphus-20081222-alt1.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of altlinux-release-sisyphus-20081222-alt1.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.; The package is  obsoleted by the package altlinux-release-t6-20110505-alt1.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of altlinux-release-t6-20110505-alt1.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.; 
c-icap-20080706.01-alt2.2.x86_64	init-lsb	warn	/etc/rc.d/init.d//c-icap: lsb init header missing.  See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.; 
c-icap-20080706.01-alt2.2.x86_64	subdir-in-var-run	info	Found a subdir in /var/run or /var/lock. /var/run and /var/lock may be mounted as temporary filesystems, so the init.d scripts must handle this correctly. This will typically amount to creating any required subdirectories dynamically when the init.d script is run, rather than including them in the package and relying on rpm to create them.; 
fonts-type1-urw-tex-2.0-alt8.noarch	invalid-url	warn	Package has invalid Url:. It looks like a protocol part (http:,ftp:,etc.) is missing.; 
fonts-type1-urw-tex-afm-2.0-alt8.noarch	invalid-url	warn	Package has invalid Url:. It looks like a protocol part (http:,ftp:,etc.) is missing.; 
fonts-type1-urw-tex-doc-2.0-alt8.noarch	invalid-url	warn	Package has invalid Url:. It looks like a protocol part (http:,ftp:,etc.) is missing.; 
gkrellmd-2.3.4-alt1.1.x86_64	init-lsb	warn	/etc/rc.d/init.d//gkrellmd: lsb init header missing.  See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.; 
host2cat-1.01-alt2.2.x86_64	init-lsb	warn	/etc/rc.d/init.d//host2cat: lsb init header missing.  See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.; 
host2cat-1.01-alt2.2.x86_64	invalid-url	warn	Package has invalid Url:. It looks like a protocol part (http:,ftp:,etc.) is missing.; 
libkpathsea-devel-2008.0-alt0.15.2.x86_64	library-pkgnames-static	warn	package contains static library which has the same name as a shared library in the repository, but neither package name ends with -devel-static according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs nor the package explicitly conflicts with the package with .so library; 
mailman-2.1.12-alt2.1.x86_64	arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share	info	The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
mailman-2.1.12-alt2.1.x86_64	init-lsb	warn	/etc/rc.d/init.d//mailman: lsb init header missing.  See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.; 
mailman-2.1.12-alt2.1.x86_64	subdir-in-var-run	info	Found a subdir in /var/run or /var/lock. /var/run and /var/lock may be mounted as temporary filesystems, so the init.d scripts must handle this correctly. This will typically amount to creating any required subdirectories dynamically when the init.d script is run, rather than including them in the package and relying on rpm to create them.; 
mailman-docs-2.1.12-alt2.1.x86_64	arch-dep-package-consists-of-usr-share	info	The package consists of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
povray-common-3.6-alt3.x86_64	arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share	info	The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
squid-conf-host2cat-1.01-alt2.2.x86_64	invalid-url	warn	Package has invalid Url:. It looks like a protocol part (http:,ftp:,etc.) is missing.; 
texlive-base-bin-2008.0-alt0.15.2.x86_64	arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share	info	The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
texlive-base-bin-2008.0-alt0.15.2.x86_64	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	There are file conflicts with the package tetex-doc-2.0-alt10.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
texlive-base-bin-2008.0-alt0.15.2.x86_64	uncompressed-manpages	info	Package contains uncompressed manual pages.; 
texlive-doc-2008.0-alt0.10.src	altlinux-policy-tex-rpm-build-texmf	warn	According to TeX policy (http://www.altlinux.org/TeXPolicy) packages that install files to /usr/share/texmf should BuildRequires(pre): rpm-build-texmf for the dependency magic to work.; 
texlive-extra-utils-2008.0-alt0.15.2.x86_64	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	There are file conflicts with the package tetex-dvips-2.0-alt10.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; There are file conflicts with the package tetex-xdvi-2.0-alt10.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
texlive-extra-utils-2008.0-alt0.15.2.x86_64	rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-file	warn	symlink /usr/bin/oxdvi is a file in the package tetex-xdvi-2.0-alt10.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
texlive-extra-utils-2008.0-alt0.15.2.x86_64	uncompressed-manpages	info	Package contains uncompressed manual pages.; 
texlive-font-utils-2008.0-alt0.15.2.x86_64	uncompressed-manpages	info	Package contains uncompressed manual pages.; 
texlive-formats-extra-2008.0-alt0.16.noarch	uncompressed-manpages	info	Package contains uncompressed manual pages.; 
texlive-lang-indic-2008.0-alt0.15.2.x86_64	arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share	info	The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
texlive-latex-base-2008.0-alt0.15.noarch	uncompressed-manpages	info	Package contains uncompressed manual pages.; 
texlive-latex-recommended-2008.0-alt0.15.noarch	uncompressed-manpages	info	Package contains uncompressed manual pages.; 
texlive-math-extra-2008.0-alt0.16.noarch	uncompressed-manpages	info	Package contains uncompressed manual pages.; 
texlive-metapost-2008.0-alt0.15.2.x86_64	arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share	info	The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
texlive-metapost-2008.0-alt0.15.2.x86_64	uncompressed-manpages	info	Package contains uncompressed manual pages.; 
texlive-metapost-2008.0-alt0.15.2.x86_64	unsafe-tmp-usage-in-scripts	fail	The test discovered scripts with errors which may be used by a user for damaging important system files. For example if a script uses in its work a temp file which is created in /tmp directory, then every user can create symlinks with the same name (pattern) in this directory in order to destroy or rewrite some system or another user's files. Scripts _must_ _use_ mktemp/tempfile or must use $TMPDIR. mktemp/tempfile is safest. $TMPDIR is safer than /tmp/ because libpam-tmpdir creates a subdirectory of /tmp that is only accessible by that user, and then sets TMPDIR and other variables to that. Hence, it doesn't matter nearly as much if you create a non-random filename, because nobody but you can access it. Found error in /usr/share/texmf-texlive/doc/metapost/featpost/xcmd/xmpost: $ grep -A5 -B5 /tmp/ /usr/share/texmf-texlive/doc/metapost/featpost/xcmd/xmpost } $arr[$#arr] =~ s/\$opt_//; print OFILE "\"$arr[$#arr]=s\") || die \"Aborted\";\n"; print OFILE "\$file = \"$tmp_mp_file\";\n"; print OFILE "\nopen TMP, \">/tmp/\$file.mp\" || die \"can't open /tmp/\$file.mp \$!\\n\";\n"; foreach $j (0..$#lines){ $_ = $lines[$j]; chop; s/\%/\\\%/g; -- print OFILE "print TMP \"$_\\n\";\n"; } print OFILE "close TMP;\n"; print OFILE "\$tmp = `inimpost featpost.mp`;\n"; print OFILE "\$tmp = `mpost -mem featpost /tmp/\$file.mp`;\n"; print OFILE "\$tmp = `laproof /tmp/\$file 1`;\n"; my $tmp = `chmod +x $ARGV[0]`; $tmp = `cp $ARGV[0].mp /tmp/$tmp_mp_file.mp`; $tmp= `inimpost featpost.mp`; $tmp = `mpost -mem featpost /tmp/$tmp_mp_file.mp`; $tmp = `laproof /tmp/$tmp_mp_file 1`; system("gv -watch $tmp_mp_file.1.eps &"); system("xcmd $ARGV[0] &");; 
texlive-music-2008.0-alt0.15.2.x86_64	arch-dep-package-consists-of-usr-share	info	The package consists of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
texlive-omega-2008.0-alt0.15.2.x86_64	arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share	info	The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
texlive-omega-2008.0-alt0.15.2.x86_64	uncompressed-manpages	info	Package contains uncompressed manual pages.; 
texlive-xetex-2008.0-alt0.15.2.x86_64	arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share	info	The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
texmf-latex-passivetex-20040310-alt1.noarch	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package passivetex-20030310-alt3.qa1.noarch, but the package passivetex-20030310-alt3.qa1.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; 
trac-spawn-fcgi-0.2-alt1.x86_64	init-lsb	warn	/etc/rc.d/init.d//trac-spawn-fcgi: lsb init header missing.  See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.; 
trac-spawn-fcgi-0.2-alt1.x86_64	missing-url	info	Missing Url: in a package.; 
trac-spawn-fcgi-0.2-alt1.x86_64	subdir-in-var-run	info	Found a subdir in /var/run or /var/lock. /var/run and /var/lock may be mounted as temporary filesystems, so the init.d scripts must handle this correctly. This will typically amount to creating any required subdirectories dynamically when the init.d script is run, rather than including them in the package and relying on rpm to create them.; 
ve-proxy-server-0.1-alt2.noarch	missing-url	info	Missing Url: in a package.; 
xbill-2.1-alt4.qa2.x86_64	freedesktop-desktop	warn	desktop-file-validate utility exited abnormally with the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/xbill.desktop: warning: file contains lines that are not UTF-8 encoded. There is no guarantee the validator will correctly work.; [Invalid UTF-8] /usr/share/applications/xbill.desktop: error: value "\xf0\xcf\xcd\xc5\xdb\xc1\xca\xd4\xc5 \xe2\xc9\xcc\xcc\xd5 \xd0\xcf\xd3\xd4\xc1\xd7\xc9\xd4\xd8 \xd3\xd7\xcf\xc0 \xef\xf3 \xce\xc1 \xd7\xd3\xc5 \xcb\xcf\xcd\xd0\xd8\xc0\xd4\xc5\xd2\xd9" for locale string key "Comment" in group "Desktop Entry" contains invalid UTF-8 characters, locale string values should be encoded in UTF-8; 
xmltex-1.8-alt6.noarch	missing-url	info	Missing Url: in a package.;